First, the panel held that firearm magazines are protected arms under the Second Amendment. Penal Code § 32310 burdened protected conduct. The panel held that under the first prong of the test, Cal. The Ninth Circuit employs a two-prong inquiry to determine whether firearm regulations violate the Second Amendment: (1) whether the law burdens conduct protected by the Second Amendment and (2) if so, what level of scrutiny to apply to the regulation. The opinion was stated by Lee, with dissent by Lynn. Chief District Judge for the Northern District of Texas (sitting by designation). The ruling Friday was made by a panel of Consuelo M. There was no immediate announcement by the state about an appeal or en banc hearing. Xavier Becerra, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the State of California. The case is officially Virginia Duncan Richard Lewis Patrick Lovette David Marguglio Christophr Waddell California Rifle & Pistol Association, Inc., a California corporation, vs. 14 and immediately hailed by gun rights groups as a win. The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals has ruled that the State of California's ban on possession of magazines that hold more than 10 rounds is a violation of the Second Amendment.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |